to post here. Safely for decades not only in German medical practices prenatal selections made. Most of the techniques mM of prenatal diagnosis are used by many women just because they want an abortion in the event of disability. The number of women in my friends and relatives, which can make this screening in order to best prepare for the care or rehabilitation of a sick baby is so far, I think, exactly zero. This is not a time more to eliminate the severity of a disease, but just about any risk of any kind disabilities. That this safety is illusory, because despite Testerei remains a residual risk and during and after birth, children can become ill and have long-term damage it. But this is already no longer an issue.
be here mM to admit that it is the churches did not have good job when it came to represent the reasons why we as parents and as a society and not so perfect people should say yes. And I recognize without envy, that those who appeared as counsel for the now common practice and experience, really know how to make opinions. Since
repeatedly pointed out the unreasonableness of the poor mothers, the burden of marriage and partnership, the disadvantages for siblings and always will be the specter of social isolation and the like financial ruin projected to any children's room wall. Now I'm not so stupid to think that it is not these charges are. You there. Even in healthy children by the way, so the most common reason given for attrition is well now that the pregnant woman or her environment are overwhelmed with the care of a child and one probably. This feeling is not always deceptive. However
is not the solution sought priority is to question how you can rebuild society so and can take values in a way that the idea to get a child immediately in women (speaking of family is so difficult, because every few years since otherwise defined) is a panic. Yes, you hold the ready availability of childcare for parents and frickelt money models to take the risk, "a family" at least predictable, However, they hold, according to my observations, the success of these efforts within very narrow limits. The tendency of the value of a man alone measure on its ability to work capacity, decreases after I feel more and more to and we do one, I think the creeps, not as healthy or more healthy and economically active people.
As for the PID, I see this as another step in the completely wrong direction. Here, embryos are first produced, to then be examined for suitability for society. Only when they must meet the requirements to start the "incarnation".
What are the requirements to parents and the society to provide these children remains - it seems to me, subject to fashion. When a disease is hard? Difficult for the parents? Too expensive for society? Where one draws the border line? When Edwards syndrome or trisomy 21? Leaning hip, cleft lip and cleft palate, sickle feet Kleinwüchigkeit? What if you get out what genes promote spelling or cause acne in puberty?
course, the latter .... no ... that would sort out but no reason someone. Well, right now there is no reason.
Who says that's not in ten years ago this could be?
What so ever I do not understand is, how can it be that a man outside a uterus after conception, no human rights has these rights in the uterus three months from the consent of the mother are related and then some time for serious disease (who can also always define it) may be revoked and then finally unwiederuflich only by birth are .... hmm ... Now, as I said I have my own personal difficulties with our legal system. Who can explain it to me feel free to contact. Incidentally, Isso no explanation in my admittedly slanted world.
Now you can say of course: Bee, you have good tap. You have no brats. Right.
However, I will not shake the feeling that something here is wrong. And I I'm also not sure that not soon again not my rights as a human being can be revoked here, if someone holds me for unreasonable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment